Categories: Ambiente

4 Years and Half after – Fukushima Pours in the Ocean Filtered Radioactive Water

11th of March 2011. A tsunami crashes into the North coasts of Japan with all the strength the ocean has. The freak wave met on its way the Fukushima nuclear plant. The rest is history.

Tempco (Tokyo Electric Power Co.) company, which manages the nuclear plant, announced that it started, after more than four years, the souring in the sea of the radioactive (but filtered) aquifer, which is close to the plant damaged by the earthquake. According to the company, the water is safe, because it is, obviously, ultra-filtered.

The past 13th of September 2015 have been poured in the ocean almost 850 tons of water that was radioactive because of the accident. Since 2011, this is the first time that the water is poured in the sea. Until nowadays, in fact, fears of the fishermen and the political/environmental pressures have always stopped the technical works. Tempco declared that the aquifer “is safe because it has been filtered through the advanced liquid processing system”, but, precisely, what does this treatment do?

tepco.co.jp

The contaminated water is treated and the Cesium is removed. After that, new filtering technologies remove the Strontium. Downline are present pretreatment systems of co-precipitation with Iron and Carbonate and, further, two different types of adsorption towers (as the figure shows). The latter two steps summarize what it is called ALPS (Advanced Liquid Processing System) process, through which more than 62 different radioactive nuclides are removed. The radioactive material removed from the filtering processes is stocked in High Integrity Containers, HIC. All those processes do not remove the Tritium which, however, has a shorter radioactive decay than a lot of others radioactive nuclides, and which is dangerous only if is eaten. The beta radiation released by Tritium for the decay, in fact, cannot penetrate the human skin.

In spite of the utilization of advanced technologies, Tepco has to find solutions for the 300 tons of “dangerous” water pulled out from the ground close to the Fukushima plant. But, especially, it has to find technical solutions for the 680 thousands of tons of high radioactive water stocked in the site which include the water used to cool down the plant after the accident on March 2011.

As happened for Italy after the Chernobyl catastrophe, in Japan too all the nuclear plants have been stopped after the March 2011 tsunami. The main difference, though, is that in my Bel Paese in 1986 has started the total nuclear plant’s decommission, in Japan the arrest was just temporary in order to – logically – maintain and check all the nuclear sites. The past 11th of August, in fact, has been reactivated the reactor Sendai 1, in the south of the nation. Close to the latter, the next month, will be reactivated the reactor Sendai 2 too. In 2016, Takahama 3 and 4 and Ikata 3 will probably start working again because, at the moment, they are considered conform to all the international and national security norms.

Lorenzo Rubino

Laureato magistrale a 24 anni in ingegneria energetica al PoliTO. Esperto in efficienza energetica industriale, commerciale, residenziale. Progettista tecnico di impianti rinnovabili e tradizionali. Responsabile di #EnergyCuE da marzo 2015. Appassionato di nuove tecnologie e policy, soprattutto se finalizzate alla sostenibilità della produzione di energia. Mi sento curioso, riflessivo ma anche spontaneo, diretto e pragmatico, da buon ingegnere!

Recent Posts

Dispersione termica verticale vs orizzontale: come l’isolamento delle intercapedini riduce i consumi del 40% (Case History)

Quando si analizza il bilancio energetico di un edificio residenziale costruito tra gli anni '60…

16 ore ago

WiDE: ecco la tecnologia che abbatte le emissioni diesel del 67% senza modificare il motore

Una revisione sistematica della letteratura scientifica pubblicata su Carbon Research analizza la tecnologia WiDE (Water-in-Diesel…

1 settimana ago

Dal 2015 il pianeta si scalda sempre più velocemente: lo conferma un nuovo studio

Un nuovo studio del Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research certifica, con una certezza statistica…

1 settimana ago

Ora sappiamo perché i modelli climatici si sbagliano sugli incendi nelle foreste del Nord

Un nuovo studio dell'Università della California Berkeley ha rilevato che gli incendi nelle foreste boreali…

2 settimane ago

Controllare i cristalli con la luce: la nuova frontiera dei materiali programmabili

Ricercatori della New York University hanno sviluppato un metodo per controllare la formazione e dissoluzione…

3 settimane ago

Plastica dai gusci di gambero che si rinforza in acqua: come funziona e perché cambia le regole dei biopolimeri

Un materiale da gusci di gambero a base di chitosano e tracce di nichel, descritto…

3 settimane ago